Public interest first.
A PRI credential holder places the safety, soundness and continuity of the systems they help operate ahead of the commercial interests of any single employer or client.
Every ARO, CRO and SCRO credential holder accepts this code on award and reaffirms it annually. It is the floor — not the ceiling — of professional conduct in operational resilience across Asia-Pacific.
Operational resilience is, in the end, a promise to people who will never read our papers — depositors, patients, passengers, citizens. This code exists so that the promise is kept when it is inconvenient to keep it.
A PRI credential holder places the safety, soundness and continuity of the systems they help operate ahead of the commercial interests of any single employer or client.
We will not soften an assessment, obscure a tolerance breach, or rewrite an incident timeline to protect a programme, a peer, or our own position.
Every claim made under a PRI credential — to a board, to a regulator, or to a counterparty — must be capable of being shown in writing, on request, with the working underneath.
Where we test, attest to, or sign off on a control we did not design, we hold ourselves to the same independence standards we would expect of a second or third line reviewer.
When asked by a competent supervisor in an APAC jurisdiction, we answer directly, in full, and without coaching from communications, legal or vendor counterparts beyond what is lawfully required.
We protect client and employer information, but confidentiality is never a shield against disclosing material resilience risks to those legally entitled to know them.
Financial interests, vendor relationships and outside appointments that could plausibly bias our resilience judgement are declared to the PRI registrar and, where relevant, to the engaging organisation.
A credential holder who can no longer meet these canons in their current role notifies the PRI registrar. The Board may suspend, censure, or strike off — and reserves the right to publish.
Complaints against a credential holder are received by the PRI registrar and adjudicated by a panel of three sitting Fellows drawn from outside the credential holder's home jurisdiction and employer. Outcomes range from private censure to permanent removal from the register, with publication at the Board's discretion.