Skip to content
Pacific Resilience Institute
The conduct standard

The PRI
Code of Ethics.

Every ARO, CRO and SCRO holder accepts this code on award and reaffirms it annually. It is the floor — not the ceiling — of professional conduct in operational resilience across Asia-Pacific.

Preamble

Operational resilience decisions affect people who will never see the analysis behind them — customers, patients, employees, counterparties. This code sets the conduct PRI credential holders are expected to maintain so those decisions are made honestly, evidenced clearly, and disclosed appropriately.

Canon I

Public interest first.

A PRI credential holder places the safety, soundness and continuity of the systems they help operate ahead of the commercial interests of any single employer or client.

Canon II

Tell the board the truth.

We will not soften an assessment, obscure a tolerance breach, or rewrite an incident timeline to protect a programme, a peer, or our own position.

Canon III

Evidence over assertion.

Every claim made under a PRI credential — to a board, to a regulator, or to a counterparty — must be capable of being shown in writing, on request, with the working underneath.

Canon IV

Independence from the function being assessed.

Where we test, attest to, or sign off on a control we did not design, we hold ourselves to the same independence standards we would expect of a second or third line reviewer.

Canon V

Regulator-grade candour.

When asked by a competent supervisor in an APAC jurisdiction, we answer directly, in full, and without coaching from communications, legal or vendor counterparts beyond what is lawfully required.

Canon VI

Confidentiality, with limits.

We protect client and employer information, but confidentiality is never a shield against disclosing material resilience risks to those legally entitled to know them.

Canon VII

No conflicts traded in private.

Financial interests, vendor relationships and outside appointments that could plausibly bias our resilience judgement are declared to the PRI registrar and, where relevant, to the engaging organisation.

Canon VIII

Hold the credential — or hand it back.

A credential holder who can no longer meet these canons in their current role notifies the PRI registrar. The Board may suspend, censure, or strike off — and reserves the right to publish.

Enforcement

How the code is upheld.

Complaints are received by the PRI registrar and adjudicated by a panel of three sitting Fellows drawn from outside the holder's home jurisdiction and employer. Outcomes range from private censure to permanent removal from the register, with publication at the Board's discretion.